Be weary of these members!
Community page.
 
Nov what waste time on a free profile then wants 200 cash
Discussion - started by Lowkey1369, posted on 30-May-17 4:18PM
Any one msg this lady what waste of time keen to meet well says it but has a man then chickens out or wants 200 cash lols just complete waste time I was keen as I quite like me Asian Girls was keen as I always see ones in my town wanted something new haha don't bover wasting ya time with Nov grrrrrr

Showing comments 362 through 411 out of 411 comments

PAGE 9: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 
Log in to see more
Comment #362 by nickiangel in response to Caldus ( view post )
Posted on 7-Jun-17 3:43PM
Get rid of him Caldus. He says we're abusive yet he's just as bad!
Posted on 7-Jun-17 3:43PM
#348 thought it was the same idiot!!
Comment #364 by Caldus in response to nickiangel ( view post )
Posted on 7-Jun-17 4:05PM
Yeah,time for him to go.
Posted on 7-Jun-17 4:23PM
Yep ban the wanker. I booted him from all my groups. Interesting that he was in pretty but all of them but doesnt pay for sex lmao
Posted on 7-Jun-17 4:45PM
He's gonebugers. :)
Comment #367 by nickiangel in response to Caldus ( view post )
Posted on 7-Jun-17 5:42PM
Awww duh!! I removed myself from this group somehow. I don't know how but.... I'm baaaaack lolololol
Posted on 7-Jun-17 5:46PM
Yet you just called cheeky a troll!
Comment #369 by 1funguy in response to nickiangel ( view post )
Posted on 7-Jun-17 5:54PM
We will call you the invisible woman nice to see you made it back
Comment #370 by Caldus in response to the main topic
Posted on 7-Jun-17 5:49PM
Lol. Well nortyman has gone!
Comment #371 by LacieEscort in response to Caldus ( view post )
Posted on 7-Jun-17 5:50PM
Bugger i just sat down for another round of
Posted on 7-Jun-17 5:51PM
Yes, him and his mate pits!
Comment #373 by 1funguy in response to Caldus ( view post )
Posted on 7-Jun-17 5:51PM
Good he will try a different name in no time
Comment #374 by Caldus in response to 1funguy ( view post )
Posted on 7-Jun-17 6:04PM
Most likely.
Comment #375 by vscap61 in response to nickiangel ( view post )
Posted on 7-Jun-17 10:27PM
Faggots always fear a female pressence nicki
Comment #376 by Caldus in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 7-Jun-17 10:44PM
Faggots? Really?
Comment #377 by nickiangel in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 1:49AM
Yes him in particular and I can think of a few other desriptive words for him too!!
Comment #378 by nickiangel in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 1:49AM
*descriptive*
Posted on 8-Jun-17 7:10AM
Hes threatened by strong females who answer back. Should be called nastyman not norty
Posted on 8-Jun-17 7:16AM
Yes "narsty"man lol
Posted on 8-Jun-17 8:09AM
Total loser. In between being nortyman and nortyasman he had a female profile youngpussy and was abusing people over on general. Issues much rofl.
Posted on 8-Jun-17 8:11AM
Oh really so your female profile youngpussy wasnt shady? Get a life. Loser
Posted on 8-Jun-17 11:29AM
What a tosspot!
Comment #384 by playtime58 in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 4:35PM
faggots.do u have a problem with gay and bisexual men.I've just changed my attitude about u
Posted on 8-Jun-17 4:45PM
No he doesn't. Just the 'fucktard' we're all referring to hates being dubbed 'faggot'. Evidently, the 'faggot; is not an escort hater, not a woman hater and not a 'poo-pusher' and yet....
Posted on 8-Jun-17 5:43PM
sorry,my apologise.if nortyasman is not all those then the only one left is wanker and that's putting it politly
Posted on 8-Jun-17 5:50PM
Precisely lol
Comment #388 by vscap61 in response to playtime58 ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 6:00PM
Been gay or bisexual does NOT make you a faggot at all, as for your attitude about me, sad that you had to be troubled changing it, but i don't really give a fuck about what others think or feel about me.
Posted on 8-Jun-17 6:39PM
Well he was nominated for biggest wanker on nzp award rofl
Comment #390 by Caldus in response to playtime58 ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 7:11PM
That was exactly what I thought.
Comment #391 by Caldus in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 7:13PM
I'd prefer you did not use that word. I find it offensive, as do many LGBT people.
Posted on 8-Jun-17 8:16PM
like
Comment #393 by playtime58 in response to Caldus ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 8:55PM
yes,I agree.I find it very offensive
Comment #394 by vscap61 in response to Caldus ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 9:10PM
I prefer to use say and do whatever i want , with no disrespect or ittention of pissing you off, just what i do. I didn't use it for the sake of using it but to "hurt" the object in question "nortyasman" . I have nothing against homosexuals, bisexuals,trisexuals etc etc. I have many friends who belong to those categories and i have worked and still do,with a number of them also. I never use this world in their pressence nor while i have a conversation with them, be it one on one or in a group, during work or socialising .
Comment #395 by Caldus in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 9:16PM
Trisexual? What are you, like 15? The English language is large and varied, there are plenty of other words you could use to insult a person without employing homophobic slang.
Comment #396 by vscap61 in response to Caldus ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 9:45PM
If so then you should know also that the term "faggot" was created back in the centuries when in the British public schools the lowest of the low socially boys were made to do the "faggot work" , which it usually was to collect sticks to make a bundle called the "faggot" and it was used instead of logs. Anyway, i used it ( 100% correctly ) and thats that. No regrets , no appologies . If it upset you it was purely because you happened not to like it and not because i wanted to upset you.
I am not going to appologise or lose sleep over it. My target was someone else and believe me, it has been hit.
Comment #397 by Millman in response to Caldus ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 9:50PM
he hasn't changed and never will . Vscap is alway right and every1 else is wrong well that what he thinks lmao
Comment #398 by Caldus in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 9:55PM
It hasn't been hit at all because I booted him from this group before you made your comment. But dream on all you like.
Comment #399 by Caldus in response to Millman ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 9:55PM
I've noticed.
Comment #400 by Caldus in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 9:59PM
Interesting because in England public school refers to what we call private, don't think there were many low socio-economic groups at Eton or Cambridge. If that's the meaning you are implying why don't you use the word around your gay and bi friends or colleagues?
Comment #401 by vscap61 in response to Millman ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 10:14PM
You are half right , i haven't changed or ever will , simply because i don't want to.
And half wrong , at which point did i mentioned Caldus to be wrong ?
And by the way , i don't think , I KNOW .
So says the one you once wanted to suck his cock off at tbe back of the airport , or my denial pissed you off ?
Comment #402 by vscap61 in response to Caldus ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 10:21PM
I expect someone like you to get it 1st time , i won't repeat it.

As for the British Public Schools
: " Coined in the victorian era, this term comes from the practice in British Public Schools of making the students do menial tasks such as gathering the sticks to make Faggots, which were used instead of logs. These menial tasks became known as "Faggot-work", and it was the lowest of the low socially that typically were made to do these tasks. These boys were often physically weak as well, and were left open to sexual advances from other boys or teachers with little or recourse to refuse"

What the hell, just for you i will make an exception
Caldus.
I dont use it around my friends because "In these times not really used if somebody is really a homosexual mostly used insteap of calling somebody stupid or a loser."
Comment #403 by goodboy in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 10:48PM
You have already said that,, you repeating yourself
Comment #404 by vscap61 in response to goodboy ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 11:12PM
You might have to learn the difference between repeating your self and copy pasting an article as a form of clarification
Comment #405 by goodboy in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 8-Jun-17 11:17PM
I can read and form my opinion with the first read thank you
Comment #406 by Caldus in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 9-Jun-17 9:11AM
I read what you wrote. I'm telling you, you are wrong. In Britain "Public School" refers to private schools.
You clearly did not read my comment. Actually it is still used as a swipe at homosexuals. You should take a better look at etymology, before making such ridiculous statements.
Comment #407 by Caldus in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 9-Jun-17 9:14AM
If you're copy and pasting from articles you should be referencing it. And you did repeat yourself.
Comment #408 by Caldus in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 9-Jun-17 9:18AM
From Wikipedia
"A public school in England and Wales is an older, student selective, fee-paying independent secondary school which caters primarily for children aged between 11 or 13 and . The term "public" should not be misunderstood to mean that these are public sector schools: they are in fact private sector."
Comment #409 by Caldus in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 9-Jun-17 9:20AM
Also from Wikipedia
"The terms fag/fagging, have been widely used for a practice of younger pupils acting as personal servants to the most senior boys for well over a hundred years in England, in the public school system of education."
Comment #410 by vscap61 in response to Caldus ( view post )
Posted on 9-Jun-17 10:19AM
Wrong about what ? That i posted an article that says British Public Schools ? Thats what they called, who cares who they are for and whether they charge fees or not. My article was copied by the Urban dictionary, clearly not quite the same terms and meanings with wikipedias , is it my fault ?
As for etymology , isn't it exactly what i did right at the begining of this , not my fault if the source i used isn't agreeable with yours. Anyway, it is a rare day off for me ,today been a friday , and i want to enjoy it.
Comment #411 by Caldus in response to vscap61 ( view post )
Posted on 9-Jun-17 10:42AM
And you're gone. I've had words with you in the past and thought what a piece of shit you are. All you have done is confirm my suspicions. You're an absolute idiot if you think Urban Dictionary is any sort of reference.

New Zealand Personals - Now in its 26th year, and still going strong
About NZPersonals  *  Contact NZPersonals  *  Help

Copyright (C) 2000-2025, NZPersonals.com Ltd

 

 

×