Been Wrongly Labeled A Sex Worker. A Discussion By Munroe

Been wrongly labeled a sex worker

Discussion - started by Munroe, posted on 8-Jun-17 5:14AM

I'm not sure why I have been classified as such so as you can imagine..... a tad unhappy. I don't have anything against sex workers but it's never nice to be accused of something you are not. I have mailed admin but have not had any response..... so here I am hoping this might bring it to their attention. I was only after a bit of mischievous fun and to fulfill my longest fantasy....

Comment #1 by Munroe in response to the main topic

Posted on 8-Jun-17 5:27AM

So I apologise to all the requests to join my group but because I am in the sex worker category I can't accept any.

Comment #2 by Magic_Hands in response to Munroe ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 6:19AM

I'm not a sex worker either but a massage therapist.

But if your after financial gain then we have be under this group.

Comment #3 by Midnight-rideher in response to the main topic

Posted on 8-Jun-17 6:39AM

Comment #4 by Magic_Hands in response to Midnight-rideher ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 6:41AM

Oi you what you laughing for

Comment #5 by Midnight-rideher in response to Magic_Hands ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 6:42AM

Its my silly sense of humour... Nzp is on the name and shame list...I wonder if they'll put a black mark against their name rofl

Comment #6 by nickiangel in response to Midnight-rideher ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 7:05AM

My sentiments exactly midnight lololol

Are you after financial gain? I don't see anything in your profile that states you are. So you're right to be pissed off! Hoewever, if you are requesting money for your encounters, then admin is correct to assign the "label". Admin can take their sweet arse time sometimes but hang in there chicy and good luck!

Comment #7 by Aliceinchains69 in response to nickiangel ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 7:22AM

She had a thread in general advertising for a sugar relationship. Either admin saw it or else i would say our old escort hating mate nawtyasman put in a complaint

Comment #8 by Aliceinchains69 in response to the main topic

Posted on 8-Jun-17 7:24AM

Sorry hun but you were asking for a sugar relationship. Anything involving financial gain requires an escort profile. Nzp keep a close eye on the threads

Comment #9 by nickiangel in response to Aliceinchains69 ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 7:25AM

Yes, saw her post sugar son. Also saw that fuckwits comments... nice tittys and escort profile now. What a douche!

Comment #10 by Midnight-rideher in response to nickiangel ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 8:20AM

He's a fucktard!

Comment #11 by Caldus in response to the main topic

Posted on 8-Jun-17 10:01AM

You want to be paid by younger guys for your time and skills? Sounds like a financial sexual agreement to me so it is "sex work".

Comment #12 by Caldus in response to the main topic

Posted on 8-Jun-17 10:02AM

Interesting that you banned sex workers from your group.

Comment #13 by Caldus in response to Midnight-rideher ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 10:03AM

Lmfao.

Comment #14 by Caldus in response to nickiangel ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 10:04AM

It states "looking for generous", that's old school for paying customers.

Comment #15 by Aliceinchains69 in response to Munroe ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 10:05AM

Why can you not accept requests for your group because you have an escort profile. So do i and i have 250 members in my group

Comment #16 by Caldus in response to Aliceinchains69 ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 10:31AM

Because she blocked sex workers from her group, so she can't access it now.

Comment #17 by Aliceinchains69 in response to Caldus ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 11:16AM

Ah i see. That's rather ironic

Comment #18 by nickiangel in response to Midnight-rideher ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 11:36AM

Yep he certainly is!!!

Comment #19 by nickiangel in response to Caldus ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 11:38AM

Ahhhh yes, see that now!! Generous males

Comment #20 by cheekygirl64 in response to Caldus ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 10:02PM

Pmsl

Comment #21 by Chvfrd in response to cheekygirl64 ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 10:08PM

Could be innocent as in generously endowed lol

Comment #22 by cheekygirl64 in response to Chvfrd ( view post )

Posted on 8-Jun-17 10:19PM

Ummmmn
Possibly not

Comment #23 by Caldus in response to Chvfrd ( view post )

Posted on 9-Jun-17 9:05AM

It's well known that generous refers to paying. Before the Prostitution Reform Act 2003 we had to be careful how we worded things.

Comment #24 by Hotrodhawkesbay in response to the main topic

Posted on 11-Apr-18 12:31PM

I would be more than happy to be taught a few extra tricks if you could look at some a little older ?

Comment #26 by bbwminx in response to Caldus ( view post )

Posted on 11-Apr-18 3:20PM

Haha!

Comment #27 by bbwminx in response to the main topic

Posted on 11-Apr-18 3:24PM

Being labelled a sex worker is nothing to be ashamed of. Perhaps it's more shameful to be judgemental of women who are open about the way they earn money?